Showing posts with label ChatGPT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ChatGPT. Show all posts

Friday

What's the best GenAI tool for language learning?

 


Check out the video for an interesting comparison between ChatGPT, Bing, and Bard when it comes to learning a language. Here's how they are rated:

Speaking and listening

How easy is it to speak and listen with these GenAI?

  • ChatGPT 2.5 (mobile app) - 2.5. Speaking works, but ChatGPT doesn't listen back. 
  • ChatGPT Mod 4.5 (modified Chrome voice extension) - Good for speaking and listening
  • Bing 3.0 - voice features (Speaking and listening) are easy to use but no way to trigger a voice response and 30 response limit
  • Bard 4.0 - Speaking and listening features, but mobile not as good as ChatGPT.
Speed and accent

Which of the GenAI allows you to modify the accent (speed and actual voice accent)?

ChatGPT 1.0 - the unmodified version does not let you change speed or accent
ChatGPT Mod 4.0 (modified Chrome voice extesion) - this allows you to adjust listening speed and it gives you a choice of accents for popular languages
Bing 1.0 - no change of listening speed or accent
Bard 1.0 - no change in listening speed or accent

Watch the video for ating of other features (multiple language switching, available on the go, reliability, convenience, mobile friendly). 

To sum up, the reviewer rates ChatGPT Mod (with Chrome voice extension) as the best GenAI tool overall for language learning.

Tuesday

Learning Design in the age of Generative AI


Donald Clark has published a very interesting blog post about how 'Learning Designers will have to adapt or die' and suggests 10 ways for them to upskill to AI.

Just how AI will affect the job market has been a hot topic for discussion recently. The Economist's message is that the West suffers from too little automation, not too much, and we shouldn't worry. 

Anecdotally, I have heard of two very different sides to how generative AI is affecting work right now. A partner's colleague who works in educational publishing has reported that this publisher has stopped working with the three freelance graphic designers they regulalrly contracted work to, and instead have hired a 'prompt engineer' for their illustration needs. On the other hand,  Mexican friend who works for a PR agency told me her boss has embraced the changes and is giving the team (copywriters and illustrators, etc) weekly training sessions on how to get the best out of AI tools, and is encouraging they use them. She also told me that she was recently asked to write an obituary of a famous entertainer who passed away unexpectedly, and using ChatGPT what would have normally have taken her four hours or so to research and write, took only twenty minutes.

What surprises me is just how unaware some people involved in the IT sector are, of the inevitable disruption to their work that generative AI poses. Some people are very switched on, like a friend of mine who works as a coder, who tells me how 50% of his job now involves him using ChatGPT to generate code. He then validates it, which is where his skill set comes in. This friend expects the money offered for coding projects will drop substantially as organisations realise it's not a time-consuming as it used to be and the skill involved is less being able to write the code, but in checking and tweaking it. However, at a birthday party recently, I got talking to someone who works in IT for an important Merchant Bank in Zurich, and she only had a vague awareness of generative AI, and hadn't even heard the term 'prompt engineer.' 

When it comes to learning design, Donald Clark reports that AI and Generative AI has "started to play a major part of the online learning landscape" with it being used for "learner engagement, syllabus planning, core skills identification, learner support, content creation, assessment, and so on."

I recommend you read Donald's blog post to see the details of how he thinks learning designers need to upskill. Some of the suggestions are obvious (e.g. moving from 'linear' to 'complex', from 'media production' to 'media generation') and will save a lot of time and money. Some are buzz words (e.g. pedAIgogy rather than pedagogy), and quite a few I don't agree with (e.g. 'Presentation skills' being replaced by 'Technical AII skills'; 'Complex AI learning journeys' replacing 'Gamification'; 'Voice' replacing 'writing, typing') I think presentation skills won't disappaer and gamification will still be used, just in a different way, People will also need to write and type. Look at what people said about AI voice assistants replacing text input (they didn't) or how some people (me, for example) hate leaving or receiving voice messages on WhatsApp - in my experience, people spend far longer and waste my time waffling their thoughts than when they send a brief and concise text message. I also can't listen to audio messages (when I'm in meetings, etc) all the time, but I can always read a text. 

Despite that, I do agree that learning design, and other jobs are about to be completely disrupted, if it isn't already happening now. 



Thursday

AI has Killed the Metaverse

 


I heard it first on Facebook, it sounded so sublime. A virtual world beyond what we see in space and time. A place where we could live and work and play. A digital dream where anything was okay.  But now AI's killed the Metaverse. and we never saw it coming at all. AI killed the Metaverse.  And now we're left with nothing at all.

Remember the Metaverse? That place that resembled Second Life but which was actually many places (Meta Multiverse?) and where you could use VR, and where the avatars didn't have any legs? What's happened to it? I think the buzz around ChatGPT, MidJourney, and all things AI has basically killed it off as anything to get excited about. To use Gartner hype-cycle-speak, the Metaverse is probably languishing in the Trough of Disillusionment with little chance of dragging itself up the Slope of Enlightenment. 

It doesn't surprise me. Although, I briefly got excited that the initial flicker of virtual worlds becoming the next big thing again, the fire was never fully lit. The Metaverse played hard to get and try as I did to understand where to go, it was never very clear. Unlike those heady days when Second Life captured people's attention back in 2007, the Metaverse never had one clear meeting place. And why didn't the avatars have legs? 

It was floundering late last year, with Forbes asking 'What happened to the Metaverse dream?' :

"Much of the world is stumped on the idea of the “metaverse dream,” where our real world would merge seamlessly with a virtual 3-D world. This would be an entirely new type of wireless wearable platform—a quantum jump from our current handheld or desktop 2-D computing world."

In this Wall Street Joirnal Tech Briefing debate,  'Can the Metaverse live up to its hype?', for my money, the best arguments were said by Phil Libin who doesn't think the Metaverse will realise its potential:

"I think the Facebok vision of the Metaverse is...so stupid it makes me sad. It accomplishes nothing. If yu're having a hard time understanding...what is it we are doing? What does this accomplish? Sometimes the emperor really doesn't have any clothes..."

...and... 

"Now more than at any other time in history, it's time to invest in the real world and really just not try to figure out what we can do with a piece of plastic duct taped to our face...I think VR is a dead-end. I think there are certian experiences that make sense in VR. Those experiences are few. Those experiences are far-between. Those experiences have been with us for twenty years. There hasn't been meaningful innovation in VR and there won't be, because there's this fallacy that what people want is more immersion, and actually people don't want immersion most of the time. That's why most of us spend most of our time in the least immersive devices possible...our phones. Instead of sitting in front of big TVs. That's why 3-D movies, which have been around since the 60's have not replaced normal movies."

Since then, we have seen such an huge explosion of interest in Artifical Intelligence generators, both image and text, that almost everyone seems to have turned their back on the Metaverse promise. 'Is the Metaverse already dead?' asks the Fast Company:

"What if the next big thing never quite becomes the next big thing? Why? Generative AI just stole its thunder. All along, plenty of observers have refused to buy into the irrational exuberance over the Metaverse. But I can't imagine anyone spending a few minutes fooling around with Open AI's ChatGPT...and concluding that generative AI is...something that requires another decade of work before it'll matter. The technology might fail to live up to 90% of its promise. It could create more problems than it solves. But it's still going to have a sprawling impact on our lives, starting this year." 

The Financial Times in February this year asked Whaever happened to the Metaverse?

"So unenthusiastic are Meta’s own investors about the idea that chief executive Mark Zuckerberg was recently forced to say that the metaverse is “not the majority of what we’re doing”. These days, he’s talking more about efficiency than the metaverse...Where did it all go wrong? The metaverse has a couple of major problems. The first is that nobody seems to be able to agree on what it is — even the people setting themselves up as the leaders of our new fantastical future can’t seem to come up with a common definition. The Metaverse never really began - and yet, it's already over. .

I can't help thinking it's aptly ironic, given the emergence of Facebook (renamed and relaunched as Meta) was largely responsible for people's excitement in Second Life being dulled. Well, that and the emergence of competitors (such as Open Sim), especially for education when Second Life raised their prices and the much-promised improvements (less lag, less requirement for a top-of-the range computer) didn't materialise. Oh, and not forgetting the appearance of Minecraft, which was an exciting game as well as a world building tool, and much easier to use. Oh, and at least the avatars in Minecraft had legs!

We thought we had control, we thought we had the power. But the machines were learning, hour by hour. Now they've taken over, and there's nothing we can do. The virtual world we built is gone, it's true. AI has killed the Metaverse. And we never saw it coming at all. AI has killed the Metaverse. And now we're left with nothing at all. 

Sunday

ChatGPT game for language learning: 20 Questions

 


The game 20 questions is a popular game for students. You can use ChatGPT to play this game with students. Either play the game online with the students with them using the software live, or use ChatGPT to generate the texts for you to use with students in class. They can either test each other in pairs or groups using the texts or you can do it with all of the students in class together. 

Here' s the prompt I used and what ChatGPT came up with when I tried it:

Let's play a game of 20 questions. Write me a short description of a place in the world without revealing the name of the place. I have twenty opportunities to ask yes/no questions to guess the name of the place. If I answer correctly, award me 5 points and then think of another place to continue playing.

Sure, let's play! Here's your first description:

This place is a city located on the banks of a river, known for its iconic tower and Gothic cathedral. It is also famous for its art museums, cuisine, and romantic atmosphere. What place am I describing?

Is it Paris? 

Yes, you got it! The place I was describing is indeed Paris, France. Well done! That's 5 points for you. Alright, let me think of another place for you to guess.

Here's your next description:

This place is a coastal city located in the southwestern United States. It is famous for its mild climate, beaches, and its association with the film industry. It is home to several major film studios and hosts an annual Academy Awards ceremony. What place am I describing?

Los Angeles? 

That's correct! The place I was describing is Los Angeles, California. Well done, you have another 5 points!

Are you ready for your next description? Here it is:

This place is an ancient city located in the Middle East. It is one of the oldest continuously inhabited cities in the world and is home to several important religious sites, including a Western Wall, a church, and a mosque. It has a complex political history and has been ruled by several different empires over the centuries. What place am I describing?

Is it Jerusalem? 

Yes, you're right again! The place I was describing is Jerusalem, one of the most important cities in the world for several major religions. That's another 5 points for you!

Shall we continue with the game? Here's your next description:

This place is a city located on the east coast of the United States. It is known for its history as a center of the American Revolution, as well as for its universities and vibrant culture. It is home to several major museums, including one of the most famous art museums in the world, and is also famous for its rowing regatta held every fall. What place am I describing?

Boston? 

Great job! You're correct, the place I was describing is indeed Boston, Massachusetts. That's 5 more points for you!

Are you ready for another round? Here's your next description:

This place is a small European country located in the Pyrenees Mountains. It is known for its beautiful scenery, with rugged mountain peaks and charming medieval towns. It has two official languages, Catalan and Spanish, and is famous for its cuisine, including dishes like paella and tapas. What place am I describing?

France?

No, it's not France. Here's a hint: This country is located between France and Spain, and it's the only country in the world where Catalan is the official language.

What is your next guess?

Andora? NB: Here I tried misspelling the name of the country to see how ChatGPT reacted. It ignored my error, self-correcting the spealling mistake in the answer.

Congratulations, that's correct! The place I was describing is Andorra, a small European country known for its stunning natural beauty and unique culture. And that's 5 more points for you!

Shall we continue with the game? Here's your next description:

This place is a major city in South America. It is the capital of a country known for its rich history and culture, including a famous dance style and a popular sport involving a ball and a net. The city is also known for its colorful buildings, lively street art, and excellent food, including dishes like empanadas and ceviche. What place am I describing?

Peru?

Sorry, that's not correct. Here's a hint: This city is known for its tango music and dance, and it is the birthplace of several famous writers, including Jorge Luis Borges and Julio Cortázar.

What is your next guess?

Buenos Aires?

Well done, you're correct! The place I was describing is Buenos Aires, the capital city of Argentina. That's another 5 points for you!

Are you ready for another round? Here's your next description:

This place is an island nation located in the Indian Ocean. It is famous for its stunning beaches, turquoise waters, and coral reefs, as well as for its unique wildlife, including giant tortoises and colorful birds. It is also known for its vanilla, cinnamon, and other spices, which were once major exports. What place am I describing?

Sri Lanka?

No, that's not correct. Here's a hint: This island nation is located in the western Indian Ocean, and it is a popular honeymoon destination.

What is your next guess?

Bali? 

Great job! You're correct, the place I was describing is Bali, one of the most popular tourist destinations in the world. And that's 5 more points for you!

Are you ready for another round? Here's your next description:

This place is a city located in Southeast Asia. It is the capital of a country known for its rich history, culture, and cuisine, and it is one of the largest and most populous cities in the world. The city is famous for its temples, street food, and markets, and it is a major center of finance and commerce in the region. What place am I describing?

Bangkok. Let's finish. How can I make this a better game for language learners?

Well done, you're correct! The place I was describing is indeed Bangkok, the capital city of Thailand.

As for making this game better for language learners, here is a suggestion:

Add a category: Instead of simply describing a place, you could choose a category, such as famous people, animals, or foods, and then describe a specific example without revealing its name. This can help learners practice vocabulary related to a specific topic

To make this game better for language learners, you could also consider using descriptions that feature vocabulary related to a specific language or culture that the learner is studying. For example, if someone is studying Spanish, you could use descriptions that feature Spanish-speaking countries or landmarks, or if someone is learning Japanese, you could use descriptions that feature Japanese cities or cultural traditions. Additionally, you could offer feedback or explanations for incorrect guesses to help the learner expand their vocabulary and comprehension.



Saturday

Chat GPT text Adventure: Late for an Interview

 


Revisiting the idea of using Chat GPT to create a text adventure, that I experimented with earlier in the week, I tried limiting the time / turns and adding a sense of challenge to the game: 

You are a text-based adventure game where you give me options (A, B, C, and D) as my choices. The setting is a big city in the present day and I have only one hour to get to a job interview. There is a transport strike and I wake up late. Each turn represents ten minute, so the game ends after 6 turns. Present obstacles to  arriving on time and reward the making of good choices and punish the making of bad choices. There is a 50% chance of  arriving on time to the interview.


Okay, let's start!

You wake up in a hurry and realize that you have only one hour to get to your job interview in a big city, but there's a transport strike. You have to find alternative ways to get to your destination.

Turn 1: You see four options in front of you. What would you like to do? A) Take a taxi B) Rent a bike C) Walk D) Try to call a friend for a ride

What is your choice?

I chose 'D' 

You decide to try to call a friend for a ride.

Turn 2: After trying to call several friends, you realize that none of them are available to give you a ride. What would you like to do next? A) Take a taxi B) Rent a bike C) Walk D) Try to find another friend

What is your choice?

Already, I think this is better than the other game. There is a sense of tension being created and a sense that I might not be successful. 

I chose 'B' next.

You decide to rent a bike.

Turn 3: You reach the bike rental shop, but it's closed. What would you like to do next? A) Take a taxi B) Try to find another bike rental shop C) Walk D) Try to find another friend

What is your choice?

Again, rising tension as the obstacles to me arriving on time increase. I chose 'A' now that time is running out. Surely taking a taxi, although the most expensive option, will be quicker and more efficient than the other options? 

You decide to take a taxi.

Turn 4: You finally find a taxi, but the traffic is extremely congested. What would you like to do next? A) Get out of the taxi and walk B) Wait in the taxi in the hope that the traffic clears up C) Try to find another taxi D) Call your interviewers to inform them of the delay

What is your choice?

At this point, I think the best option is to inform the interviewers I may arrive late, do I chose 'D'.

You decide to call your interviewers to inform them of the delay.

Turn 5: Your call goes to voicemail, and you are unable to leave a message. What would you like to do next? A) Get out of the taxi and walk B) Wait in the taxi in the hope that the traffic clears up C) Try to find another taxi D) Try calling your interviewers again

What is your choice?

 The tension increases. I'm going to try and walk there now, so I chose 'A'.

You decide to get out of the taxi and walk.

Turn 6: You arrive at your interview with only a few minutes to spare. Your interviewers are impressed by your determination and resourcefulness in the face of adversity.

Congratulations! You arrived on time to your job interview, and your persistence and resourcefulness made a positive impression on your interviewers. With a 50% chance of arriving on time, you have successfully beaten the odds. Good luck with the interview!

Success! Overall I think this is a better game. First of all, it's shorter. There is also a sense of challenge and tension. Follow-up activities for learners could include writing a report of the choices and a reflection on what they might do dofferently if they played the game again. 

I decided to ask ChatGPT for feedback on my choices: 

"What choices were good ones?"

In this scenario, the following choices were good ones:

  • Calling your interviewers to inform them of the delay (Turn 5)
  • Getting out of the taxi and walking (Turn 6)

Both of these choices demonstrate your determination and resourcefulness in the face of adversity, and could have made a positive impression on your interviewers.

And to follow up, I asked about the not so good ones:

"What choices could have been better? and why?

In this scenario, the following choices could have been better:

  • Trying to call a friend for a ride (Turn 1)
  • Renting a bike (Turn 3)
  • Waiting in the taxi in the hope that the traffic clears up (Turn 5)

Trying to call a friend for a ride was a good idea in theory, but was not successful due to none of your friends being available. Renting a bike would have been a good alternative, but the bike rental shop was closed. Waiting in the congested taxi would have further delayed your arrival, and could have negatively impacted your impression on the interviewers.

Walking, even though it was a last resort, was the best option as it allowed you to get to the interview location in time, demonstrating your determination and resourcefulness in a difficult situation.

Impressed with what Chat GPT came up with, I asked for suggestions to improve the game and make it more fun and challenging:

"Could you makie suggestions how this game scenario could be improved to make it more fun and/or challenging?"

Sure, here are a few suggestions for how this game scenario could be improved to make it more fun and challenging:

  1. Random events: Introduce random events such as road closures, accidents, or unexpected weather changes that could impact your travel time. This would add an element of unpredictability and challenge to the game.

  2. Multiple endings: Add multiple endings based on the player's choices and their arrival time. For example, if the player arrives on time, they could get the job, but if they are late, they might miss the opportunity.

  3. Multiple characters: Introduce multiple characters with different skills and abilities that the player can choose from, each with their own unique challenges and strengths. This would add an extra level of strategy to the game.

  4. Time management: Implement a time management system where the player must balance speed with efficiency, making sure they don't waste time but also don't rush and make mistakes.

  5. Bonus points: Offer bonus points for making good choices or finding shortcuts. These points could be used to purchase upgrades or special items to help the player in future turns.

By incorporating these elements, the game could become more engaging, challenging, and fun for the player.

As a consequence, I asked ChatGPT to incorproate these lements into the game and asked to play again:

"Please incorporate all of these suggestions into the game and start the scenario again."

Sure, here is the updated scenario incorporating all the suggestions:

Setting: A big city in the present day. You have only one hour to get to a job interview. There is a transport strike, and you wake up late. Each turn represents ten minutes, so the game ends after 6 turns.

You play as one of multiple characters with different skills and abilities, and must choose the best course of action to arrive on time for your interview. You will face obstacles along the way and must balance speed with efficiency to arrive on time. Points will be awarded for making good choices and finding shortcuts.

Turn 1: You have just woken up and realized that there is a transport strike and you have only one hour to get to a job interview. What would you like to do first? A) Call a friend for a ride B) Rent a bike C) Walk D) Take a taxi

What is your choice?

Like the last time, I chose A. 

You decide to call a friend for a ride.

Turn 1, random event: Unfortunately, none of your friends are available to give you a ride. What would you like to do next? A) Rent a bike B) Walk C) Take a taxi D) Call an Uber

What is your choice?

I chose the new suggstion, 'D'. 

You decide to call an Uber.

Turn 2, random event: There is an accident on the route to your interview, causing heavy traffic and delaying your Uber. What would you like to do next? A) Rent a bike B) Walk C) Take a taxi D) Call another Uber

What is your choice?

As in the first time I played this scenario, I chose to rent a bike:

You decide to rent a bike.

Turn 3: You arrive at the bike rental shop, but it is closed due to the transport strike. What would you like to do next? A) Walk B) Take a taxi C) Call another Uber D) Look for alternative transportation

What is your choice?

This time, intrigued at what it might suggest, I chose 'D'. 

You decide to look for alternative transportation.

Turn 3, random event: You come across a bicycle sharing stand with available bikes. What would you like to do next? A) Rent a bike B) Walk C) Take a taxi D) Call another Uber

What is your choice?

I thought the best choice here is 'A'

You decide to rent a bike from the bicycle sharing stand.

Turn 4: You are now riding the bike, trying to make up for lost time. What would you like to do next? A) Take a shortcut through the park B) Stick to main roads C) Take a detour to avoid traffic D) Stop and ask for directions

What is your choice?

I chose 'A' 

You decide to take a shortcut through the park.

Turn 4, random event: You encounter a short cut-off due to a fallen tree branch blocking the path. What would you like to do next? A) Turn back B) Take a detour C) Climb over the tree branch D) Wait for park workers to clear the path

What is your choice?

'C' seemed to be the best choice to take here. 

You decide to climb over the tree branch.

Turn 5: You are now on the other side of the park, making good time. What would you like to do next? A) Stop and ask for directions B) Stick to main roads C) Take a detour to avoid traffic D) Take a risk and try to make up more time

What is your choice?

As it's the second time I've been presented with the choice, I selected 'A'

You decide to stop and ask for directions.

Turn 5, random event: The person you ask for directions is a delivery driver and offers you a ride to the interview. What would you like to do next? A) Accept the ride B) Decline the ride and continue on your bike C) Take a taxi D) Call an Uber

What is your choice?

Of course, I'm going to accept the kindness of strangers, so 'A'

You decide to accept the ride from the delivery driver.

Turn 6: You arrive at the interview just in time. Congratulations!

You received 100 points for making smart choices, using alternative transportation and finding shortcuts. Well done!

Success again! I think the extra random events mean that there would be a lot more differentiation when the learners play the game, which can only be a good thing, especially for the debrief session at the end. Again, I asked for feedback:

"What were the best choices and what were the worst ones and why?"

The best choices were:

  • Renting a bike from the bicycle sharing stand (Turn 3)
  • Taking the shortcut through the park and climbing over the tree branch (Turns 4 and 5)
  • Accepting the ride from the delivery driver (Turn 5)

These choices showed initiative and resourcefulness in the face of obstacles, and allowed you to save time and reach the interview on time.

There were no "worst" choices in this scenario, as every decision had some potential consequences, but also some benefits. For example, walking could have been the quickest option if you lived close to the interview location, but it was not available in this scenario.

Finally, I asked advice from Chat GPT to make the game event better:

There are a few things that could make this game even better:

  1. More diverse options: Offering more choices and allowing the player to personalize their experience would make the game more engaging and replayable.

  2. Increased random events: Adding more random events and branching paths would increase the unpredictability and excitement of the game.

  3. More realistic consequences: Incorporating realistic consequences for each choice, such as traffic, road closures, and weather conditions, would make the game more challenging and true to life.

  4. A scoring system: Implementing a scoring system that rewards good choices and punishes bad ones would add an extra layer of challenge and competition to the game.

  5. A storyline: Adding a storyline or a goal to the game, such as reaching the interview on time, would give the player a sense of purpose and motivation to make good choices.

By incorporating these elements, the game would become more immersive, engaging, and replayable, providing a fun and challenging experience for the player.

Interesting response as I think there is a storyline (albeit a weak one). I think adding a scoring system would be interesting.  But, what can I say? I'm impressed. I'll have a think about variations on this, playing with variations on the prompt, but I think the prompt for this text adventure game is  pretty good. What do you think? 









Moving to Substack

  I've decided to start blogging on Substack rather than here.  Come and join me over there .